To a lesser extent, the clearing of land for agriculture, industry, and other human activities has increased concentrations of greenhouse gases. The consequences of changing the natural atmospheric greenhouse are difficult to predict, but some effects seem likely:. Outside of a greenhouse, higher atmospheric carbon dioxide CO 2 levels can have both positive and negative effects on crop yields. Some laboratory experiments suggest that elevated CO 2 levels can increase plant growth.
However, other factors, such as changing temperatures, ozone, and water and nutrient constraints, may more than counteract anypotential increase in yield.
If optimal temperature ranges for some crops are exceeded, earlier possible gains in yield may be reduced or reversed altogether.
Climate extremes, such as droughts, floods and extreme temperatures, can lead to crop losses and threaten the livelihoods of agricultural producers and the food security of communities worldwide. Depending on the crop and ecosystem, weeds, pests, and fungi can also thrive under warmer temperatures, wetter climates, and increased CO 2 levels, and climate change will likely increase weeds and pests.
Finally, although rising CO 2 can stimulate plant growth, research has shown that it can also reduce the nutritional value of most food crops by reducing the concentrations of protein and essential minerals in most plant species.
Climate change can cause new patterns of pests and diseases to emerge, affecting plants, animals and humans, and posing new risks for food security, food safety and human health. Scientists have no doubt that humans are causing global warming. Ilissa Ocko, Climate Scientist. Act when it matters most Every day more than 60 people sign up for news and alerts, to find out when their support helps most.
The western city of Ahmedabad is preparing residents to cope with the longer and more intense heat waves sweeping across South Asia—and inspiring other Indian cities and states to follow suit. The most widespread, damaging storms on earth are getting worse, and climate change is a big reason why.
The U. Healing the planet starts at home—in your garage, in your kitchen, and at your dining-room table. Short answer: Yes. Even a seemingly slight average temperature rise is enough to cause a dramatic transformation of our planet. How smog, soot, greenhouse gases, and other top air pollutants are affecting the planet—and your health. As temperatures and carbon levels rise, even breathing has become a challenge. NRDC senior attorney Ben Longstreth explains how plaintiffs for these cases get chosen—and how you can help advance the cause in or out of the courtroom.
Gun-control activists want to use financial levers to curtail firearm sales. Can we do the same for carbon emissions? We will keep you informed with the latest alerts and progress reports. What Causes Global Warming? Biden Pledges to Cut U. Carbon Emissions in Half by Greenhouse Effect Climate Change Is In the Air. Thanks for signing up. This model finds the relationship between both human and natural climate forcings and temperature that best matches observed temperatures, both globally and over land areas only.
The figure below shows the estimated role of each different climate forcing in changing global surface temperatures since records began in — including greenhouse gases red line , aerosols dark blue , land use light blue , ozone pink , solar yellow and volcanoes orange. The black dots show observed temperatures from the Berkeley Earth surface temperature project, while the grey line shows the estimated warming from the combination of all the different types of forcings.
The combination of all radiative forcings generally matches longer-term changes in observed temperatures quite well. There are also periods from and where some larger disagreements are evident between projected and observed warming, both in this simple model and in more complex climate models. The chart highlights that, of all the radiative forcings analysed, only increases in greenhouse gas emissions produce the magnitude of warming experienced over the past years.
If greenhouse gas emissions alone were warming the planet, we would expect to see about a third more warming than has actually occurred. The extra warming from greenhouse gases is being offset by sulphur dioxide and other products of fossil fuel combustion that form atmospheric aerosols. Aerosols in the atmosphere both reflect incoming solar radiation back into space and increase the formation of high, reflective clouds, cooling the Earth.
Ozone is a short-lived greenhouse gas that traps outgoing heat and warms the Earth. Ozone is not emitted directly, but is formed when methane, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds break down in the atmosphere. Increases in ozone are directly attributable to human emissions of these gases.
In the upper atmosphere, reductions in ozone associated with chlorofluorocarbons CFCs and other halocarbons depleting the ozone layer have had a modest cooling effect. The net effects of combined lower and upper atmospheric ozone changes have modestly warmed the Earth by a few tenths of a degree.
For example, replacing a forest with a field will generally increase the amount of sunlight reflected back into space, particularly in snowy regions. The net climate effect of land-use changes since is a modest cooling. Volcanoes have a short-term cooling effect on the climate due to their injection of sulphate aerosols high into the stratosphere, where they can remain aloft for a few years, reflecting incoming sunlight back into space. However, once the sulphates drift back down to the surface, the cooling effect of volcanoes goes away.
The orange line shows the estimated impact of volcanoes on the climate, with large downward spikes in temperatures of up to 0. Finally, solar activity is measured by satellites over the past few decades and estimated based on sunspot counts in the more distant past. The amount of energy reaching the Earth from the sun fluctuates modestly on a cycle of around 11 years. There has been a slight increase in overall solar activity since the s, but the amount of additional solar energy reaching the Earth is small compared to other radiative forcings examined.
Over the past 50 years, solar energy reaching the Earth has actually declined slightly , while temperatures have increased dramatically. The accuracy of this model depends on the accuracy of the radiative forcing estimates. Some types of radiative forcing like that from atmospheric CO2 concentrations can be directly measured and have relatively small uncertainties. Others, such as aerosols, are subject to much greater uncertainties due to the difficulty of accurately measuring their effects on cloud formation.
These are accounted for in the figure below, which shows combined natural forcings blue line and human forcings red line and the uncertainties that the statistical model associates with each. These shaded areas are based on different estimates of radiative forcings, incorporating research attempting to estimate a range of values for each.
Uncertainties in human factors increase after , driven largely by increases in aerosol emissions after that point.
0コメント